There is no doubt that Mr. Trifkovic was right in his assessment that the number of killed people (both civilians and military) during the last war in Bosnia couldn't be more than 70,000. Personally, I do not believe that all casualties (killed or missing persons) including the whole area of the former SFRJ could have overfilled that number. On the other side, I think, we have another, much bigger problem, situated in our (Serbian) attitude towards the number of Serbs who were killed all along the Five-Years-Balkan-War in former Yugoslavia. Particularly, I do not remember that we've ever come out with the exact number of Serbs who had lost their lives in the period of 1991-1995. It seems to be a hardly explainable indifference and negligence of the Serb authorities in Serbia and Republika Srpska. On the other side we have Bosnian Muslims whose estimation of killed persons were highly exaggerated. As we see, in the beginning they "operated" with the cipher of 250,000 even 300,000 of dead people (mostly Muslims) and, as time had being elapsed, they slowly were diminishing that number.
Of course, Muslims and their Western advisors and supporters have achieved their main goal in this part of Balkan, because they well know that the first impression (that Muslims allegedly were victims of the Serbian chauvinism and cruelty, in one word - of genocide!) can't be obliterated so easily (if ever). In the mind of an average man in the West and in the largest part of the world Serbs are "depicted" (branded) as a bloodiest and a wildest murderers (even animals). If we really want to remove that unjust stigma of our heads we have to understand a psychological mechanism (psycho-warfare) of a certain kind of "emotional stroke", our enemies had skillfully used against us up to now. False reports, unchecked buzzes and rumors appeared to be a very powerful weapon, which we had experienced, for instance, in Markale market, Račak and other similar places, where the real events had been subjected to an abominable distortion and presented to the world media as an horrible and unprecedented Serbian crimes. Unfortunately, we did almost nothing to remind the world of Vasa Miskin street in Sarajevo, Dobrovoljacka in Tuzla, Medacki dzep in Krajina, where Moslems and Croats committed the most horrifying and undisputable crimes, even in the front of UN forces who had observed it quietly, without any word of a normal human compassion. It confirmed the thesis that Serbs (in the eyes of the Westerners) are not even a living creatures worthy of the simple mentioning.
Of course, Muslims and their Western advisors and supporters have achieved their main goal in this part of Balkan, because they well know that the first impression (that Muslims allegedly were victims of the Serbian chauvinism and cruelty, in one word - of genocide!) can't be obliterated so easily (if ever). In the mind of an average man in the West and in the largest part of the world Serbs are "depicted" (branded) as a bloodiest and a wildest murderers (even animals). If we really want to remove that unjust stigma of our heads we have to understand a psychological mechanism (psycho-warfare) of a certain kind of "emotional stroke", our enemies had skillfully used against us up to now. False reports, unchecked buzzes and rumors appeared to be a very powerful weapon, which we had experienced, for instance, in Markale market, Račak and other similar places, where the real events had been subjected to an abominable distortion and presented to the world media as an horrible and unprecedented Serbian crimes. Unfortunately, we did almost nothing to remind the world of Vasa Miskin street in Sarajevo, Dobrovoljacka in Tuzla, Medacki dzep in Krajina, where Moslems and Croats committed the most horrifying and undisputable crimes, even in the front of UN forces who had observed it quietly, without any word of a normal human compassion. It confirmed the thesis that Serbs (in the eyes of the Westerners) are not even a living creatures worthy of the simple mentioning.
Notwithstanding the West's obvious biasing and favoring the two sides (Moslem's and Croatian) it would be very unproductive (even unfair) to throw all the blame over "occidental" shoulders. The crucial question is what we have done in the name of truth? Almost nothing. Although it is all about our own skin? One would say we are waiting the truth to come out to the surface from itself. Ridiculous! The leading world's media are shaping the public opinion and they are making the parallel history. From the ancient times the written word has been the most dangerous weapon. Eight centuries ago Stefan Nemanja warned us what will be occurring if we do not have a deep consciousness about the enormous importance of the writing as well as the spoken word. It seems, the time has come to pay our obscure and inapprehensible negligence towards the essential thing which determines man as an intelligent being. Our native language is decaying rapidly and we are still standing peacefully like a herd of unconscious large-brained craniates. Even worse, because animals have the inborn instinct to gather them (group) in case of danger, preparing themselves for natural defense.
Our time is evidently running out. Maybe we have a couple of years ahead to assemble our collective mind and try to act as it should be normal in an event of mortal combat. One is for sure: if we continue to spend our intellectual strength in mutual disputes, trying to depict ourselves better than other our compatriots are, our fate will be soon sealed forever. Is an intellectual mortuary our inevitable destiny? If we do not have convoked our intellectual potentials - yes! Otherwise (in case of a profound noetic amalgamation) we still have a good chance to survive in this world of terror, lies and prevarication. In that sense I appeal to Srdja Trifkovic (undoubtedly, one of the leading Serbian intellectuals of today) not to be selfish and narcissistic. Sagacious minds of a stingy character are something that Serbs can not and dare not afford themselves in the future. There is only one chance for Serbs to stay on a map of the world. They should create the nucleus of the Serbian "common" brain. In today's world of global communication it could be done without much difficulties. We need no money no additional equipment; all we need is a good will and a normal desire to help ourselves not to dwindle away like the worthless soap-bubble.
Happy New Year And Merry Christmas
1 comment:
I have written the above text as an answer to the dr. Srđa Trifkovic's commentary at http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/News/Trifkovic:
BOSNIAN WAR DEAD MYTH DEBUNKED:
CHRONICLES WAS RIGHT, AGAIN
by Srdja Trifkovic
The assertion that some 250,000 people were killed during the Bosnian war in the 1990s is an obligatory part of the postmodern media ritual dealing with the Balkans. Over the past 12 years the claim has been repeated ad nauseam in countless outlets, and still continues to be repeated. It is routinely inserted into wire reports that are carried by thousands of dailies. It is repeated by the electronic media and by editorialists as a fact, not as an estimate that is open to doubt or can be legitimately disputed. It is presented as fact by the U.S. Government, and in particular by its authoritative Country Report on Human Rights Practices, published by the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. President "Bill" Clinton, addressing the nation on November 27 1995, repeated the figure of 250,000. His Defense Secretary, William Perry, testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee on June 7, 1995, declared that "there were, by our best estimate, about 130,000 civilian casualties"-and that in 1992 alone! Similar claims have been made on the Left and on the Right, by Gentiles, Jews, and Muslims propagandists alike.
On December 10 we were finally told by a "mainstream" media outlet that the facts of the Bosnian case may not be quite as clear cut as we had been led to believe. "The death toll from Bosnia's 1992-95 war, widely estimated at being at least 200,000, was considerably lower," a Reuters report announced on that day. According to Reuters, a Bosnian Muslim investigator by the name of Mirsad Tokaea, head of a team of researchers working on a Norwegian government grant, has established that the true number is closer to 100,000; but even that figure is yet to be verified: "After cross-referencing, we have whittled down the number of those killed to about 80,000 right now."
A similar assessment had come some months earlier from an unexpected source. According to the research done by The Hague Tribunal (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, ICTY), "the number of people killed in the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina was around 102,000." Since the Tribunal's continued existence is critically dependent on the continued exaggeration of all Yugoslav war crimes, even that figure should be taken with a grain of salt. The research project was conducted by the two population experts, Ewa Tabeau and Jacub Bijak, who work for the Office of the Prosecutor at The Hague. They were nevertheless deemed so explosive that the findings were presented at a conference for demographers in Norway a year ago "but they have not been revealed to the wider public."
This extremely interesting report has been ignored by all English-language media outlets that have embraced and propagated the myth of "250,000 dead in Bosnia."
Chronicles readers do not need to depend on the good will of The Hague Tribunal to make its politically sensitive findings widely known, however, or on the willingness of the media to report such news even if they are released. Eight years ago I published an article in the magazine ("The Hague Tribunal: Bad Justice, Worse Politics," Chronicles No. 8, August 1996, pp. 15-19) that dealt with the number of dead in Bosnia on the basis of facts readily available to the curious even at that time. The article noted that, compared to the horrors of Afro-Asian postcolonial killing fields, the war in the Balkans was no worse than a regular "medium-sized local conflict":
"The 'Bosnian Holocaust' story was fabricated by the Muslim side as part of a wide-ranging and effective PR campaign. In December 1992, the Izetbegovic authorities first claimed that there were 128,444 dead on the 'Bosnian' side (including Croats and "Serbs loyal to the Bosnian Government"). According to [ex-State Department official george] Kenney, this figure was cooked by adding together the 17,466 confirmed dead until that time, and the 111,000 that the Muslims had already claimed as missing."
Kenney recalled the precise moment-on June 28, 1993-when Izetbegovic's deputy minister of information, Senada Kreso, told journalists that "200,000 had died." He regarded that assertion as "an outburst of naive zeal," and was taken aback when "the major newspapers and wire services quickly began using these numbers, unsourced and unsupported." The figure eventually grew to 250,000 fatalities by 1994, and has been peddled ever since without serious challenge.
In reality, after an initial bout of heavy fighting (summer-fall 1992), from 1993 to mid-1995 there was a period of relative calm on most fronts in Bosnia, interrupted by brief outbursts in isolated localities (Gorazde, Bihac). Stories of mass murder and grand-scale atrocities, such as "Srebrenica," have never been independently substantiated. On the basis of different sources (ICRC, British military intelligence etc), my conclusion back in 1996 was that "the war in Bosnia is unlikely to have resulted in more than 70,000 deaths. Including Croatia/Krajina, the Yugoslav wars of 1991-95 have killed up to, but not more than, 100,000 people."
Over the past nine years I've had no reason to make any radical alteration to this overall assessment. Even if Mr. Tokaca's current figure of 80,000 "verified" names of individual victims is accurate, after almost a decade I stand corrected by 14 percent. President Clinton et al were wrong by more than 300 percent. If the lie of the "Bosnian genocide" is eventually unmasked in the coming year or two, by the same token we can expect the lie of the "Kosovo genocide" to follow suit not too long thereafter (and if you need a reminder of what a whopper that was, you can find it here). The truth will out eventually, even if the political consequences of the lie-such as dozens of destroyed Christian shrines, and hundreds of thousands of Christians expelled or murdered by Muslims-are irreversible. The truth exists; it is the lie that needs inventing.
Dr. S. Trifkovic
Foreign Affairs Editor, CHRONICLES
928 N Main Street, Rockford, IL 61103
voice (815) 964-5054 fax (815) 964-9403
Post a Comment