Thank you Robert!
I see you are perfectly (well) informed about the historical facts and the reasons why the demonization of Serbs re-erupted and never stopped after the nineties of the 20th centuries.
As you have already said, one of the main reasons that Serbs are outlawed and convicted (in advance) for any possible evil in the world is the fact that Serbs were the victims of the most hideous crime ever committed on this planet (one of the most notorious WWII death camps - Jasenovac-Gradina), which was approved and consciously/purposely directed by the highest circles of the Catholic priesthood. Before the First World War Austro-Hungarian politicians and clergy announced they deadly anti-Serbian doctrine with slogan: Serbien muss sterbien (Serbia must die!; sterben). Yesterday is like today, and today will be like tomorrow - nothing will essentially change. Serbia was and will always be a boring blood-besprinkled sputum in the Westerner's throat, which should be coughed up and spat out once for all.
The other thing that aggravates Serbian position is the Serbian "Russian-like" appearance. Namely, in the mind of an average Western man the Serbs are surrogates for his obsessive "red-Russian" menace; something he has been frightened with since the day he was born. Psychologically It could be called a "change of motives" where the real but powerful enemy was substituted with a small (manifold weaker) imitation of the original adversary.
Beside the above "historically-conditioned pressures" Serbia is burdened with an additional and rather unforeseen exigency, which sprang directly out of the American contemporary anti-Muslim and "anti-terrorists" policy. Actually, USA is trying to convince the Middle East Muslims that Uncle Sam has nothing against the Muslim world in general; and the best example to prove such a stance is the Balkan. According to US administration, the Balkan Muslims are "moderate" and "civilized" people and they, unlike their Middle-Eastern "brothers", deserve any kind of Imperial help and sustenance. Finally, if you wish to help someone to obtain his freedom - i.e. if you intend to "liberate" him from an oppression - the first thing you must do is to locate and identify his "oppressor". To the Serbian misfortune, nobody in the Balkan region fits better for the role of an invented torturer as the Serbs do.
Dušan Vukotić
Dusan,
You are correct in your view that the West, in total, participated in the cover up of the Serbian Holocaust because at the time of the end of WWII Europe, political preferences were shifting massively towards socialism and the Soviets were held in high esteem for their central role in the defeat of Nazi Germany. The British who were the main architects of the cover up generally were not in favor of Catholicism, but the overwhelming threat of Soviet Socialism made partners out of former adversaries.
The British started their project for a unified anti Serb Yugoslavia in December 1941 when they sent Col. William Bailey to Canada to recruit Croatian communist for guerrilla war training and eventual insertion into Yugoslavia. So why do the British want to create a Croat communist force in Yugoslavia. Who would they fight - their most natural opponents would be the Serb Royalist (Mihailovic).
The British next send Bailey as liaison officer to Mahailovic and within a year Bailey is trying to organize the assassination of Mihailovic. As we say in the US - "the fix was in" It didn't matter what Mihailovic did or didn't do, he was doomed because the British knew he was a Serb patriot and would seek justice at war's end and that would expose the Catholic Church - game over.
Robert Oklejas
